World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Battle of Asculum (279 BC)

Article Id: WHEBN0001226765
Reproduction Date:

Title: Battle of Asculum (279 BC)  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: History of Apulia, 279 BC, Quintus Aemilius, Battle of the Strait of Messina, Battle of the Cranita hills
Collection: 279 Bc, Battles of the Pyrrhic War, History of Apulia
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Battle of Asculum (279 BC)

This article refers to the Pyrrhic War battle fought in 279 BC. For the Second Punic War battle fought in 209 BC, see Battle of Asculum (209 BC).
Battle of Asculum
Part of the Pyrrhic War

Battle sites and places of the Pyrrhic War
Date 279 BC
Location Asculum, modern Ascoli Satriano, Apulia, Italy
Result Epirote Pyrrhic victory
Roman Republic Epirus,
Magna Graecia
Commanders and leaders
Publius Decius Mus Pyrrhus of Epirus
40,000 cavalry and infantry,
300 anti-elephant devices
40,000 cavalry and infantry,
20 war elephants
Casualties and losses
8,000 killed 3,000 killed

The Battle of Asculum (or Ausculum)[1] took place in 279 BC between the Romans under the command of Consul Publius Decius Mus and the combined Tarantine, Oscan, Samnite, and Epirote forces, under the command of the Greek king Pyrrhus of Epirus. The battle occurred during the Pyrrhic War for control of Magna Graecia.


  • Prelude and Armies 1
  • Battle 2
  • Aftermath 3
  • Bibliography 4
  • References 5

Prelude and Armies

The battle at Asculum was the second encounter between Pyrrhus' primarily Macedonian army and several Roman legions. According to written accounts of the engagement from the era, the two armies were likely close to the same size at 40,000 men each.

The Roman force was largely made up of infantry, an estimated four legions totaling 25,000 Romans, in addition to Dauni allies. After the Battle of Heraclea, in which the presence of war elephants had proved decisive, the legions had apparently equipped a portion of their total force with anti-elephant devices: chariots fitted with long spikes meant to wound the elephants' vulnerable legs, pots filled with flammable materials meant to frighten the elephants into retreat, flares and support troops who were trained to hurl pila.

Pyrrhus's army consisted of Epirote infantry and cavalry, Macedonian infantry and cavalry, Greek mercenary infantry, allied Italian Greeks (including Tarentine hoplites and cavalry), twenty war elephants, and Samnite, Etruscan, Umbrian, Lucanian, and Umbrian mercenaries. The Greek army had notable advantages in both cavalry numbers and in the unique presence of its elephants. However, in order to counter the flexibility of the legions, Pyrrhus mixed some light Italic troops with his phalanx.


The battle was fought over two days. As was customary of the warfare of the period, both armies deployed their cavalry on the wings and infantry in the center. Pyrrhus held his personal cavalry in reserve behind the centre under his own command. The elephants were also initially held in reserve.

On the first day, the Greek cavalry and elephants went largely unused as they were blocked from the Roman advances by woodland and hills in the vicinity of the battleground, although the Italic soldiers in the phalanxes reportedly engaged the Romans very effectively. Pyrrhus's Macedonians broke the Roman first legion and Rome's Latin allies on their left wing but the Roman third and fourth legions overcame the Tarentines, Oscans and Epirotes in Pyrrhus' centre. Meanwhile, a force of Dauni attacked the Greek camp. Pyrrhus dispatched reserve cavalry to deal with the breakthrough along with part of the regular horse and several elephants. When the attackers withdrew to an almost inaccessible position atop a steep hill, Pyrrhus deployed the elephants against the third and fourth legions, who likewise proceeded to take refuge in heavily wooded areas on high ground while remaining under constant fire from the archers and slingers escorting the elephants. Pyrrhus sent Athamanian, Acharnian and Samnite infantry to drive the Romans out of the woods, but those forces were intercepted by Roman cavalry. Both sides withdrew at dusk, neither having gained a significant advantage.

At dawn, Pyrrhus sent light infantry to occupy the treacherous high ground which had proven to be the cause of stalemate the previous day, thereby forcing the Romans to fight in the open or flee. As at Heraclea, the infantry and cavalry engaged in a massive line collision, until the elephants, supported by light infantry, broke through the Roman line. As a result, the specialized anti-elephant Roman devices were quickly deployed by Roman commanders and officers; though briefly proving effective, the small force was eventually overwhelmed by Greek psiloi. The Romans succumbed to the combined pressure of the phalanx and elephants, which Pyrrhus ordered to advance. Pyrrhus simultaneously ordered his personal cavalry to charge, beginning and quickly completing a significant rout. The defeated Roman force retreated.


Traditionally, it is believed that Roman casualties totaled nearly 8,000, while Pyrrhus lost some 3,000, including many of his officers. Pyrrhus later famously commented on his victory, stating, "One more such victory, and we are undone."[2][3] It is from reports of this semi-legendary event that the term Pyrrhic victory originates.



  1. ^ Michael Grant, The History of Rome, p. 79
  2. ^ Plutarch, Life of Pyrrhus, 21:9.
  3. ^   Available online at the Perseus Project.

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.