In mathematics, geometric calculus extends the geometric algebra to include differentiation and integration. The formalism is powerful and can be shown to encompass other mathematical theories including differential geometry and differential forms.^{[1]}
Contents

Differentiation 1

Product rule 1.1

Interior and exterior derivative 1.2

Integration 2

Fundamental theorem of geometric calculus 2.1

Covariant derivative 3

Relation to differential geometry 4

Relation to differential forms 5

History 6

References 7
Differentiation
With a geometric algebra given, let a and b be vectors and let F(a) be a multivectorvalued function. The directional derivative of F(a) along b is defined as

\nabla_b F(a) = \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0}{\frac{F(a + \epsilon b)  F(a)}{\epsilon}}
provided that the limit exists, where the limit is taken for scalar ε. This is similar to the usual definition of a directional derivative but extends it to functions that are not necessarily scalarvalued.
Next, choose a set of basis vectors \{e_i\} and consider the operators, noted (\partial_i), that perform directional derivatives in the directions of (e_i):

\partial_i : F \mapsto (x\mapsto \nabla_{e_i} F(x))
Then, using the Einstein summation notation, consider the operator :

e^i\partial_i
which means:

F \mapsto e^i\partial_i F
or, more verbosely:

F \mapsto (x\mapsto e^i\nabla_{e_i} F(x))
It can be shown that this operator is independent of the choice of frame, and can thus be used to define the geometric derivative:

\nabla = e^i\partial_i
This is similar to the usual definition of the gradient, but it, too, extends to functions that are not necessarily scalarvalued.
It can be shown that the directional derivative is linear regarding its direction, that is:

\nabla_{\alpha a + \beta b} = \alpha\nabla_a + \beta\nabla_b
From this follows that the directional derivative is the inner product of its direction by the geometric derivative. All needs to be observed is that the direction a can be written a = (a\cdot e^i) e_i, so that:

\nabla_a = \nabla_{(a\cdot e^i)e_i} = (a\cdot e^i)\nabla_{e_i} = a\cdot(e^i\nabla_{e^i}) = a\cdot \nabla
For this reason, \nabla_a F(x) is often noted a\cdot \nabla F(x).
The standard order of operations for the geometric derivative is that it acts only on the function closest to its immediate right. Given two functions F and G, then for example we have

\nabla FG = (\nabla F)G.
Product rule
Although the partial derivative exhibits a product rule, the geometric derivative only partially inherits this property. Consider two functions F and G:

\begin{align}\nabla(FG) &= e^i\partial_i(FG) \\ &= e^i((\partial_iF)G+F(\partial_iG)) \\ &= e^i(\partial_iF)G+e^iF(\partial_iG) \end{align}
Since the geometric product is not commutative with e^iF \ne Fe^i in general, we cannot proceed further without new notation. A solution is to adopt the overdot notation, in which the scope of a geometric derivative with an overdot is the multivectorvalued function sharing the same overdot. In this case, if we define

\dot{\nabla}F\dot{G}=e^iF(\partial_iG),
then the product rule for the geometric derivative is

\nabla(FG) = \nabla FG+\dot{\nabla}F\dot{G}
Interior and exterior derivative
Let F be an rgrade multivector. Then we can define an additional pair of operators, the interior and exterior derivatives,

\nabla \cdot F = \langle \nabla F \rangle_{r1} = e^i \cdot \partial_i F

\nabla \wedge F = \langle \nabla F \rangle_{r+1} = e^i \wedge \partial_i F.
In particular, if F is grade 1 (vectorvalued function), then we can write

\nabla F = \nabla \cdot F + \nabla \wedge F
and identify the divergence and curl as

\nabla \cdot F = \operatorname{div} F

\nabla \wedge F = I \, \operatorname{curl} F.
Note, however, that these two operators are considerably weaker than the geometric derivative counterpart for several reasons. Neither the interior derivative operator nor the exterior derivative operator is invertible.
Integration
Let \{e_1, \, ... \, e_n\} be a set of basis vectors that span an ndimensional vector space. From geometric algebra, we interpret the pseudoscalar e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge\cdots\wedge e_n to be the signed volume of the nparallelotope subtended by these basis vectors. If the basis vectors are orthonormal, then this is the unit pseudoscalar.
More generally, we may restrict ourselves to a subset of k of the basis vectors, where 1 \le k \le n, to treat the length, area, or other general kvolume of a subspace in the overall ndimensional vector space. We denote these selected basis vectors by \{e_{i_1}, \, ... \, e_{i_k} \}. A general kvolume of the kparallelotope subtended by these basis vectors is the grade k multivector e_{i_1} \wedge e_{i_2} \wedge\cdots\wedge e_{i_k}.
Even more generally, we may consider a new set of vectors \{x^{i_1}e_{i_1}, \, ... \, x^{i_k}e_{i_k} \} proportional to the k basis vectors, where each of the \{x^{i_j}\} is a component that scales one of the basis vectors. We are free to choose components as infinitesimally small as we wish as long as they remain nonzero. Since the outer product of these terms can be interpreted as a kvolume, a natural way to define a measure is

\begin{align}\mathrm{d}^kX &= \left(\mathrm{d}x^{i_1} e_{i_1}\right) \wedge \left(\mathrm{d}x^{i_2}e_{i_2}\right) \wedge\cdots\wedge \left(\mathrm{d}x^{i_k}e_{i_k}\right) \\ &= \left( e_{i_1}\wedge e_{i_2}\wedge\cdots\wedge e_{i_k} \right) \mathrm{d}x^{i_1} \mathrm{d}x^{i_2} \cdots \mathrm{d}x^{i_k}\end{align}
The measure is therefore always proportional to the unit pseudoscalar of a kdimensional subspace of the vector space. Compare the Riemannian volume form in the theory of differential forms. The integral is taken with respect to this measure:

\int_V F(x) \mathrm{d}^kX = \int_V F(x) \left( e_{i_1}\wedge e_{i_2}\wedge\cdots\wedge e_{i_k} \right) \mathrm{d}x^{i_1} \mathrm{d}x^{i_2} \cdots \mathrm{d}x^{i_k}
More formally, consider some directed volume V of the subspace. We may divide this volume into a sum of simplices. Let \{x_i\} be the coordinates of the vertices. At each vertex we assign a measure \Delta U_i(x) as the average measure of the simplices sharing the vertex. Then the integral of F(x) with respect to U(x) over this volume is obtained in the limit of finer partitioning of the volume into smaller simplices:
\int_V F dU = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{i=1}^n F(x_i) \Delta U_i(x).
Fundamental theorem of geometric calculus
The reason for defining the geometric derivative and integral as above is that they allow a strong generalization of Stokes' theorem. Let \mathsf{L}(A;x) be a multivectorvalued function of rgrade input A and general position x, linear in its first argument. Then the fundamental theorem of geometric calculus relates the integral of a derivative over the volume V to the integral over its boundary:

\int_V \dot{\mathsf{L}} \left(\dot{\nabla} dX;x \right) = \oint_{\partial V} \mathsf{L} (dS;x)

As an example, let \mathsf{L}(A;x)=\langle F(x) A I^{1} \rangle for a vectorvalued function F(x) and a (n1)grade multivector A. We find that

\begin{align}\int_V \dot{\mathsf{L}} \left(\dot{\nabla} dX;x \right) &= \int_V \langle\dot{F}(x)\dot{\nabla} dX I^{1} \rangle \\ &= \int_V \langle\dot{F}(x)\dot{\nabla} dX \rangle \\ &= \int_V \nabla \cdot F(x) dX . \end{align}
and likewise

\begin{align}\oint_{\partial V} \mathsf{L} (dS;x) &= \oint_{\partial V} \langle F(x) dS I^{1} \rangle \\ &= \oint_{\partial V} \langle F(x) \hat{n} dS \rangle \\ &= \oint_{\partial V} F(x) \cdot \hat{n} dS \end{align}
Thus we recover the divergence theorem,

\int_V \nabla \cdot F(x) dX = \oint_{\partial V} F(x) \cdot \hat{n} dS.
Covariant derivative
A sufficiently smooth ksurface in an ndimensional space is deemed a manifold. To each point on the manifold, we may attach a kblade B that is tangent to the manifold. Locally, B acts as a pseudoscalar of the kdimensional space. This blade defines a projection of vectors onto the manifold:

\mathcal{P}_B (A) = (A \cdot B^{1}) B
Just as the geometric derivative \nabla is defined over the entire ndimensional space, we may wish to define an intrinsic derivative \partial, locally defined on the manifold:

\partial F = \mathcal{P}_B (\nabla )F
(Note: The right hand side of the above may not lie in the tangent space to the manifold. Therefore it is not the same as \mathcal{P}_B (\nabla F), which necessarily does lie in the tangent space.)
If a is a vector tangent to the manifold, then indeed both the geometric derivative and intrinsic derivative give the same directional derivative:

a \cdot \partial F = a \cdot \nabla F
Although this operation is perfectly valid, it is not always useful because \partial F itself is not necessarily on the manifold. Therefore we define the covariant derivative to be the forced projection of the intrinsic derivative back onto the manifold:

a \cdot DF = \mathcal{P}_B (a \cdot \partial F) = \mathcal{P}_B (a \cdot \mathcal{P}_B (\nabla F))
Since any general multivector can be expressed as a sum of a projection and a rejection, in this case

a \cdot \partial F = \mathcal{P}_B (a \cdot \partial F) + \mathcal{P}_B^{\perp} (a \cdot \partial F),
we introduce a new function, the shape tensor \mathsf{S}(a), which satisfies

F \times \mathsf{S}(a) = \mathcal{P}_B^{\perp} (a \cdot \partial F),
where \times is the commutator product. In a local coordinate basis \{e_i\} spanning the tangent surface, the shape tensor is given by

\mathsf{S}(a) = e^i \wedge \mathcal{P}_B^{\perp} (a \cdot \partial e_i).
Importantly, on a general manifold, the covariant derivative does not commute. In particular, the commutator is related to the shape tensor by

[a \cdot D, \, b \cdot D]F=(\mathsf{S}(a) \times \mathsf{S}(b)) \times F.
Clearly the term \mathsf{S}(a) \times \mathsf{S}(b) is of interest. However it, like the intrinsic derivative, is not necessarily on the manifold. Therefore we can define the Riemann tensor to be the projection back onto the manifold:

\mathsf{R}(a \wedge b)=\mathcal{P}_B (\mathsf{S}(a) \times \mathsf{S}(b)).
Lastly, if F is of grade r, then we can define interior and exterior covariant derivatives as

D \cdot F = \langle DF \rangle_{r1}

D \wedge F = \langle D F \rangle_{r+1},
and likewise for the intrinsic derivative.
Relation to differential geometry
On a manifold, locally we may assign a tangent surface spanned by a set of basis vectors \{e_i\}. We can associate the components of a metric tensor, the Christoffel symbols, and the Riemann tensor as follows:

g_{ij}=e_i \cdot e_j

\Gamma^k_{ij}=(e_i \cdot De_j) \cdot e^k

R_{ijkl}=(\mathsf{R}(e_i \wedge e_j) \cdot e_k) \cdot e_l
These relations embed the theory of differential geometry within geometric calculus.
Relation to differential forms
In a local coordinate system (x^{1}, ..., x^{n}), the coordinate differentials dx^{1}, ..., dx^{n} form a basic set of oneforms within the coordinate chart. Given a multiindex i_{1}, ..., i_{k} with 1 ≤ i_{p} ≤ n for 1 ≤ p ≤ k, we can define a kform

\omega = f_I\mathrm{d}x^I=f_{i_1,i_2\cdots i_k}\mathrm{d}x^{i_1}\wedge \mathrm{d}x^{i_2}\wedge\cdots\wedge \mathrm{d}x^{i_k}.
We can alternatively introduce a kgrade multivector A as

A = f_{i_1,i_2\cdots i_k}e^{i_1}\wedge e^{i_2}\wedge\cdots\wedge e^{i_k}
and a measure

\begin{align}\mathrm{d}^kX &= \left(\mathrm{d}x^{i_1} e_{i_1}\right) \wedge \left(\mathrm{d}x^{i_2}e_{i_2}\right) \wedge\cdots\wedge \left(\mathrm{d}x^{i_k}e_{i_k}\right) \\ &= \left( e_{i_1}\wedge e_{i_2}\wedge\cdots\wedge e_{i_k} \right) \mathrm{d}x^{i_1} \mathrm{d}x^{i_2} \cdots \mathrm{d}x^{i_k}\end{align}.
Apart from a subtle difference in meaning for the exterior product with respect to differential forms versus the exterior product with respect to vectors (indeed one should note that in the former the increments are covectors, whereas in the latter they represent scalars), we see the correspondences of the differential form

\omega \cong A^{\dagger} \cdot \mathrm{d}^kX = A \cdot \left(\mathrm{d}^kX \right)^{\dagger},
its derivative

\mathrm{d}\omega \cong (D \wedge A)^{\dagger} \cdot \mathrm{d}^{k+1}X = (D \wedge A) \cdot \left(\mathrm{d}^{k+1}X \right)^{\dagger},
and its Hodge dual

\star\omega \cong (I^{1} A)^{\dagger} \cdot \mathrm{d}^kX,
embed the theory of differential forms within geometric calculus.
History
Following is a diagram summarizing the history of geometric calculus.
History of geometric calculus.
References

^ David Hestenes, Garrett Sobczyk: Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus, a Unified Language for mathematics and Physics (Dordrecht/Boston:G.Reidel Publ.Co., 1984, ISBN 9027725616
This article was sourced from Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, EGovernment Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a nonprofit organization.