World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

History of web syndication technology

Article Id: WHEBN0009538947
Reproduction Date:

Title: History of web syndication technology  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Web syndication, Reverse blog, Corporate blog, Web syndication formats, Musement
Collection: History of the Internet, Web Syndication Formats
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

History of web syndication technology

This article is specifically dedicated to the history of web syndication technology and, more generally, to the history of technical innovation on many dialects of web syndication feeds such as RSS and Atom, as well as earlier variants such as Channel Definition Format (CDF) and more recent innovations like GData.


  • Pre-RSS Formats 1
  • RSS creation 2
  • Initial adoption of RSS (2000–2003) 3
  • Development of Atom (2003) 4
  • Atom 1.0 and IETF standardization 5
  • Post-Atom technical developments related to web syndication 6
  • HTML5 7
  • References 8
  • External links 9
    • Early RSS history from several different personal points of view 9.1

Pre-RSS Formats

Before RSS, several similar formats already existed for syndication, but none achieved widespread popularity or are still in common use today, as most were envisioned to work only with a single service. These originated from push technology; two of the earliest examples are Backweb and Pointcast.[1]

Between 1995 and 1997, Ramanathan V. Guha and others at Apple Computer's Advanced Technology Group developed the Meta Content Framework (MCF).[2] MCF was a specification for structuring metadata information about web sites and other data, and the basis of Project X (aka Hot Sauce), a 3D flythrough visualizer for the web. When the research project was discontinued, Guha left Apple for Netscape.

Guha joined Netscape in 1997 and, after meeting XML co-creator Tim Bray, decided to turn MCF into an XML application.[3] Guha and Bray jointly adapted MCF to use XML and submitted a specification to the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in June 1997.[4] This combination of MCF with XML later gave rise to the Resource Description Framework (RDF).[5][6][7] (Tim Bray's own account of this work gives generous credit to Guha.[8])

In March 1997, Microsoft submitted a detailed specification for CDF to the W3C.[9] This format was designed for the Active Channel feature of Internet Explorer 4.0. CDF never became popular, perhaps because of the extensive resources it required at a time when people were mostly on dial-up. Backweb and Pointcast were geared towards news, much like a personal application programming interface (API) feed. Backweb later morphed into providing software updates, a precursor to the push update features used by various companies now.

In September 1997, Netscape previewed a new, competing technology "Aurora," said to be based on RDF, which stated was based on XML.[10] A slightly later CNET article describes the October 1997,[2] submission to W3C of a draft for RDF,[5] by a working group that included members from many different companies, including R.V. Guha of Netscape.

In December 1997, Dave Winer designed his own XML syndication format for use on his Scripting News weblog.[11]

RSS creation

RDF Site Summary, the first web syndication format to be called "RSS", was offered by Netscape in March 1999 for use on the My Netscape portal. This version became known as RSS 0.9.[12]

In July 1999, responding to comments and suggestions, Dan Libby produced a prototype tentatively named RSS 0.91[13] (RSS standing for Rich Site Summary at that time), that simplified the format and incorporated parts of Winer's scripting news format. This they considered an interim measure, with Libby suggesting an RSS 1.0-like format through the so-called Futures Document.[14]

In April 2001, in the midst of AOL's acquisition and subsequent restructuring of Netscape properties, a re-design of the My Netscape portal removed RSS/XML support. The RSS 0.91 DTD was removed during this re-design, but in response to feedback, Dan Libby was able to restore the DTD, but not the RSS validator previously in place. In response to comments within the RSS community at the time, Lars Marius Garshol, to whom authorship of the original 0.9 DTD is sometimes attributed, commented, "What I don't understand is all this fuss over Netscape removing the DTD. A well-designed RSS tool, whether it validates or not, would not use the DTD at Netscape's site in any case. There are several mechanisms which can be used to control the dereferencing of references from XML documents to their DTDs. These should be used. If not the result will be as described in the article."[15]

Effectively, this left the format without an owner, just as it was becoming widely used.

Initial adoption of RSS (2000–2003)

A working group and mailing list, RSS-DEV, was set up by various users and XML notables to continue its development. At the same time, Winer unilaterally posted a modified version of the RSS 0.91 specification to the Userland website, since it was already in use in their products. He claimed the RSS 0.91 specification was the property of his company, UserLand Software.[16]

Since neither side had any official claim on the name or the format, arguments raged whenever either side claimed RSS as its own, creating what became known as the RSS fork.

The RSS-DEV group went on to produce RSS 1.0 in December 2000.[17] Like RSS 0.9 (but not 0.91) this was based on the RDF specifications, but was more modular, with many of the terms coming from standard metadata vocabularies such as Dublin Core.

Nineteen days later, Winer released by himself RSS 0.92,[18] a minor and supposedly compatible set of changes to RSS 0.91 based on the same proposal. In April 2001, he published a draft of RSS 0.93 which was almost identical to 0.92.[19] A draft RSS 0.94 surfaced in August, reverting the changes made in 0.93, and adding a type attribute to the description element.

In September 2002, Winer released a final successor to RSS 0.92, known as RSS 2.0 and emphasizing "Really Simple Syndication" as the meaning of the three-letter abbreviation. The RSS 2.0 spec removed the type attribute added in RSS 0.94 and allowed people to add extension elements using XML namespaces. Several versions of RSS 2.0 were released, but the version number of the document model was not changed.

In November 2002, The New York Times began offering its readers the ability to subscribe to RSS news feeds related to various topics. In January 2003, Winer called the New York Times' adoption of RSS the "tipping point" in driving the RSS format's becoming a de facto standard.

In July 2003, Winer and Userland Software assigned ownership of the RSS 2.0 specification to his then workplace, Harvard's Berkman Center for the Internet & Society.[20]

Development of Atom (2003)

As of 2003, the primary method of web content syndication was the RSS family of formats. Members of the community who felt there were significant deficiencies with this family of formats were unable to make changes directly to RSS 2.0 because it was copyrighted by Harvard University and "frozen" by the official specification document, which stated that "no significant changes can be made and it is intended that future work be done under a different name".[6])

In June 2003, Sam Ruby set up a wiki to discuss what makes "a well-formed log entry". This initial posting acted as a rallying point. [7] People quickly started using the wiki to discuss a new syndication format to address the shortcomings of RSS. It also became clear that the new format could also form the basis of a more robust replacement for blog editing protocols such as Blogger API and LiveJournal XML-RPC Client/Server Protocol.

The project aimed to develop a web syndication format that was: [8]

  • "100% vendor neutral,"
  • "implemented by everybody,"
  • "freely extensible by anybody, and"
  • "cleanly and thoroughly specified."

In short order, a project road map was built. The effort quickly attracted more than 150 supporters including Dave Sifry of Technorati, Mena Trott of Six Apart, Brad Fitzpatrick of LiveJournal, Jason Shellen of Blogger, Jeremy Zawodny of Yahoo!, Timothy Appnel of the O'Reilly Network, Glenn Otis Brown of Creative Commons and Lawrence Lessig. Other notables supporting Atom include Mark Pilgrim, Tim Bray, Aaron Swartz, Joi Ito, and Jack Park. [9] Also, Dave Winer, the key figure behind RSS 2.0, gave tentative support to the Atom endeavor (which at the time was called Echo.)[10]

After this point, discussion became chaotic, due to the lack of a decision-making process. The project also lacked a name, tentatively using "Pie," "Echo," and "Necho" before settling on Atom. After releasing a project snapshot known as Atom 0.2 in early July 2003, discussion was shifted off the wiki.

The discussion then moved to a newly set up mailing list. The next and final snapshot during this phase was Atom 0.3, released in December 2003. This version gained widespread adoption in syndication tools, and in particular it was added to several Google-related services, such as Blogger, Google News, and Gmail. Google's Data APIs (Beta) GData are based on Atom 1.0 and RSS 2.0.

Atom 1.0 and IETF standardization

In 2004, discussions began about moving the Atom project to a standards body such as the W3C or the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). The group eventually chose the IETF and the Atompub working group was formally set up in June 2004, finally giving the project a charter and process. The Atompub working group is co-chaired by Tim Bray (the co-editor of the XML specification) and Paul Hoffman. Initial development was focused on the syndication format.

The final draft of Atom 1.0 was published in July 2005 and was accepted by the IETF as a "proposed standard" in August 2005. Work then continued on the further development of the publishing protocol and various extensions to the syndication format.

The Atom Syndication Format was issued as a proposed "internet official protocol standard" in IETF RFC 4287 in December 2005 with the help of the co-editors Mark Nottingham and Robert Sayre.

Post-Atom technical developments related to web syndication

In January 2005, Sean B. Palmer, Christopher Schmidt, and Cody Woodard produced a preliminary draft of RSS 1.1.[21] It was intended as a bugfix for 1.0, removing little-used features, simplifying the syntax and improving the specification based on the more recent RDF specifications. As of July 2005, RSS 1.1 had amounted to little more than an academic exercise.

In April 2005, Apple released Safari 2.0 with RSS Feed capabilities built in. Safari delivered the ability to read RSS feeds, and bookmark them, with built-in search features. Safari's RSS button is a blue rounded rectangle with "RSS" written inside in white. The favicon displayed defaults to a newspaper icon.

In November 2005, Microsoft proposed its Simple Sharing Extensions to RSS.[22]

In December 2005, Microsoft announced in blogs that Internet Explorer 7[23] and Microsoft Outlook 12 (Outlook 2007)[24] will adopt the feed icon first used in the Mozilla Firefox, effectively making the orange square with white radio waves the industry standard for both RSS and related formats such as Atom. Also in February 2006, Opera Software announced they too would add the orange square in their Opera 9 release.[25][26]

In January 2006, Rogers Cadenhead relaunched the RSS Advisory Board in order to move the RSS format forward.[27]

In January 2007, as part of a revitalization of Netscape by AOL, the FQDN for was redirected to a holding page in preparation for an impending relaunch, and as a result some news feeders using RSS 0.91 stopped working.[28] The DTD has again been restored.


In 2013 the Candidate Recommendation for HTML5 included explicit provision for syndication by introducing the 'article' element.[29]


  1. ^ Kelly, Kevin; Gary Wolf (1997-03). "Push!". Wired 5 (03). Retrieved 2014-09-13. 
  2. ^ a b Lash, Alex (3 October 1997). "W3C takes first step toward RDF spec". Archived from the original on 13 July 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2011. 
  3. ^ Andreessen, Marc (8 January 1999). "Innovators of the Net: R.V. Guha and RDF". Netscape. Archived from the original on 6 June 2002. Retrieved 5 January 2011. 
  4. ^ Guha, Ramanathan V.; Bray, Tim (6 June 1997). "Meta Content Framework Using XML". World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 5 January 2010. 
  5. ^ a b Miller, Eric; Schloss, Bob; Lassila, Ora; Swick, Ralph R.; Sakata, Tsuyoshi; Maloney, Murray; Schloss, Bob; URAMOTO, Naohiko; Roberts, Bill; Daniel, Ron; Layman, Andrew; McConnell, Chris; Paoli, Jean; Guha, Ramanathan V.; Lassila, Ora; LeVan, Ralph; Miller, Eric; Wolf, Misha; Wood, Lauren; Bray, Tim; Resnick, Paul;  
  6. ^ Brickley, Dan; Guha, Ramanathan V. (3 March 1999). "Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification". World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  7. ^ Lassila, Ora; Swick, Ralph R. (22 February 1999). "Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification". World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  8. ^ Bray, Tim (21 May 2003). "The Challenge". Retrieved 5 January 2010. 
  9. ^ Ellerman, Castedo (9 March 1997). "Channel Definition Format (CDF)". World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 5 January 2011. 
  10. ^ Clark, Tim (29 September 1997). "Netscape previews Aurora". Archived from the original on 15 July 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2011. 
  11. ^ Winer, Dave (15 December 1997). "Scripting News in XML". Scripting News. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  12. ^ "My Netscape Network: Quick Start". Netscape. Archived from the original on 8 December 2000. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  13. ^ Libby, Dan (10 July 1999). "RSS 0.91 Spec, revision 3". Netscape. Archived from the original on 4 December 2000. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  14. ^ "MNN Future Directions". Netscape. Archived from the original on 4 December 2000. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  15. ^ King, Andrew (13 April 2003). "The Evolution of RSS".  
  16. ^ Winer, Dave (4 June 2000). "RSS 0.91: Copyright and Disclaimer".  
  17. ^ Beged-Dov, Gabe; Brickley, Dan; Dornfest, Rael; Davis, Ian; Dodds, Leigh; Eisenzopf, Jonathan; Galbraith, David; Guha, Ramanathan V.; MacLeod, Ken; Miller, Eric; Swartz, Aaron; van der Vlist, Eric (9 December 2000). "RDF Site Summary (RSS) 1.0". RSS-DEV Working Group.  
  18. ^ Winer, Dave (24 August 2003). "RSS 0.92 Specification".  
  19. ^ Winer, Dave (21 April 2001). "RSS 0.93 Specification". UserLand Software. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  20. ^ "RSS 2.0 Specification moves to Berkman".  
  21. ^ Palmer, Sean B. and Christopher Schmidt (23 January 2005). "RSS 1.1: RDF Site Summary". Retrieved 31 October 2006. 
  22. ^ "Simple Sharing Extensions for RSS and OPML".  
  23. ^ "Icons: It’s still orange".  
  24. ^ Affronti, Michael (15 December 2005). "RSS icon goodness". Microsoft Developer Network. Microsoft. Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  25. ^ Goldman, Daniel (15 February 2006). "Opera partially adopts new RSS feed icon". Opera Watch. Retrieved 17 March 2010. 
  26. ^ Borg, Johan (15 June 2006). "It's Friday again! (well, in Asia)". Opera Desktop Team. Opera Software. Retrieved 17 March 2010. 
  27. ^ Cadenhead, Rogers (30 January 2006). "RSS Advisory Board Goes Public". Retrieved 20 January 2011. 
  28. ^ Thompson, Bill (15 January 2007). "For want of a file, the net was lost".  
  29. ^ W3C org draft proposal for article element

External links

Early RSS history from several different personal points of view

  • History of RSS compiled in 2003 by Joseph Reagle
  • History of RSS compiled in 2004 by Dave Winer
  • History of the RSS fork compiled in 2002 by Mark Pilgrim
  • History of ESS Feed in 2012
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.