World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Non-rocket spacelaunch

Article Id: WHEBN0017037094
Reproduction Date:

Title: Non-rocket spacelaunch  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Space elevator, Mass driver, Spaceflight, Space fountain, Rocket sled launch
Collection: Aerospace Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Megastructures, Non-Rocket Spacelaunch, Reusable Space Launch Systems, Space Access, Spaceflight
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Non-rocket spacelaunch

Non-rocket space launch refers to concepts for launch into space where some or all of the needed speed and altitude are provided by something other than expendable rockets.[1] A number of alternatives to expendable rockets have been proposed. In some systems such as skyhook, rocket sled launch, rockoon and air launch, a rocket is used to reach orbit, but it is only "part" of the system.

Present-day launch costs are very high – $10,000 to $25,000 per kilogram from Earth to low Earth orbit (LEO).[2] As a result, launch costs are a large percentage of the cost of all space endeavors. If launch costs can be made cheaper the total cost of space missions will be reduced. Fortunately, due to the exponential nature of the rocket equation, providing even a small amount of the velocity to LEO by other means has the potential of greatly reducing the cost of getting to orbit.

Getting launch costs down into the hundreds of dollars per kilogram range would make many of the proposed large-scale space projects such as space colonization, space-based solar power[3] and terraforming Mars[4] possible.

An artist's rendition of a proposed circular Magnetic Satellite Launch System, a form of mass driver.


  • Comparison 1
  • Static structures 2
    • Space tower 2.1
  • Tensile structures 3
    • Skyhook 3.1
    • Space elevator 3.2
    • Endo-atmospheric tethers 3.3
  • Dynamic structures 4
    • Space fountain 4.1
    • Orbital ring 4.2
    • Launch loop 4.3
    • Pneumatic freestanding tower 4.4
  • Projectile launchers 5
    • Electromagnetic acceleration 5.1
      • Mass driver 5.1.1
      • StarTram 5.1.2
      • Rail gun 5.1.3
    • Chemical 5.2
      • Space gun 5.2.1
      • Ram accelerator 5.2.2
      • Blast wave accelerator 5.2.3
    • Mechanical 5.3
      • Slingatron 5.3.1
    • Air launch 5.4
    • Spaceplanes 5.5
    • Laser propulsion 5.6
  • Balloon 6
    • SpaceShaft 6.1
  • Hybrid launch systems 7
  • See also 8
  • References 9
  • External links 10


Comparison of space launch methods
Initial operating condition for new systems
Method(a) Publication year Estimated build cost
Payload mass
Estimated cost to LEO
Metric tons per year
Technology readiness level
Conventional rocket[2] 1903[5] 700 – 130,000 4,000 – 20,000 200 9
Space elevator 1895[6] 2
Non-rotating Skyhook 1990 < 1 2
Hypersonic Skyhook[7] 1993 < 1(c) 1,500(d) 30(e) 2
Rotovator[8] 1977 2
HASTOL[9][10] 2000 15,000(f) 2
Orbital ring[11] 1980 15 2*1011 < 0.05 4*1010 2
Launch loop[12] (small) 1985 10 5,000 300 40,000 2+
Launch loop[12] (large) 1985 30 5,000 3 6,000,000 2+
KITE Launcher[13] 2005 2
StarTram[14] 2001 20(g) 35,000 43 150,000 2
Ram accelerator 2004 < 500 6
Space gun[15] 1865(h) 0.5 450 500 6
Slingatron[16][17] 100 2 to 4
Laser propulsion[18] 2 100 550 3000 Up to 4
Microwave propulsion[19] 1 < 100 600
Orbital Airship

(a) References in this column apply to entire row unless specifically replaced.
(b) All monetary values in un-inflated dollars based on reference publication date except as noted.
(c) CY2008 estimate from description in 1993 reference system.
(d) Requires first stage to ~ 5 km/s.
(e) Subject to very rapid increase via bootstrapping.
(f) Requires Boeing proposed DF-9 vehicle first stage to ~ 4 km/s.
(g) Based on Gen-1 reference design, 2010 version.
(h) Jules Verne's novel From the Earth to the Moon. Newton's cannonball in the 1728 book A Treatise of the System of the World was considered a thought experiment.[20]

Static structures

In this usage, the term "static" is intended to convey the understanding that the structural portion of the system has no internal moving parts.

Space tower

A space tower is a tower that would reach outer space. To avoid an immediate need for a vehicle launched at orbital velocity to raise its perigee, a tower would have to extend above the edge of space (above the 100 km Kármán line), but a far lower tower height could reduce atmospheric drag losses during ascent. Satellites can orbit temporarily in elliptical orbits dipping as low as 135 km or less, yet orbital decay causing reentry would be rapid unless altitude was later raised to hundreds of kilometers.[21] If the tower went all the way to geosynchronous orbit at approximately 36,000 km, or 22,369 miles, objects released at such height could then drift away with minimal power and would be in a circular orbit. Building a tower to that extreme height is not possible with current materials on Earth. The concept of a structure reaching to geosynchronous orbit was first conceived by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky,[22] who proposed a compression structure, or "Tsiolkovsky tower".

A parallel-sided structure made of conventional brick and stone cannot reach past approximately 2000 meters, since the bricks at the bottom would be crushed under the cumulative weight of the bricks above them.[23] Other materials could allow the tower to reach a greater height, especially if the structure tapers (i.e. the upper parts are narrower than the bottom), but with current construction techniques, cost increases exponentially with construction height. Buckling may be a failure mode before exceeding a material's nominal compressive yield strength (though designs such as with a truss may help compensate), but, aside from that and aside from design against weather, the theoretical scale height of a structure is the allowable load of its material divided by the product of density and local gravitational acceleration, where needed material cross-section increases by a factor of e (2.718...) over each scale height.[24]

For common plain carbon steel under a typical allowable stress limit, its scale height is 1.635 kilometer. A 4.9-kilometer-high tower (3 × its scale height) of such would accordingly mass at least 20 times the weight supported at its top (as e3 20). In contrast, an example of a more expensive high-performance aerospace material, Amoco T300/ERL1906 carbon composite, has a scale height of 54 kilometers at a safety factor of 2, though construction challenges, including wind loading, would apply. Earth's atmosphere has approximately 50% of its mass under 6 kilometers elevation, 90% below 16 kilometers, and 99% below 30 kilometers of altitude.[24][25]

Natural mountains reach up to 9 km altitude. As of 2013, the tallest man-made structure is the Burj Khalifa, which is 829.8 m tall. A tower or other high-altitude facility could form one component of a launch system, such as being the base station of a space elevator, or a support pillar for the distal part of a mass driver or the "gun barrel" of a space gun.

Alternatives other than compressive structures, such as tethers hanging down from high-altitude balloons or superconductor-based magnetic levitation, could take advantage of how: the characteristic length of Kevlar and some other macro-scale material performance in tension (instead of compression) is up to hundreds of kilometers; compressive buckling becomes no longer applicable; and setup might be simpler. Inflatable, kinetic, and electronic structures could also be options.

Tensile structures

Tensile structures for non-rocket spacelaunch are proposals to use long, very strong cables (known as tethers) to lift a payload into space. Tethers can also be used for changing orbit once in space.

Orbital tethers can be tidally locked (skyhook) or rotating (rotovators). They can be designed (in theory) to pick up the payload when the payload is stationary or when the payload is hypersonic (has a high but not orbital velocity).

Endo-atmospheric tethers can be used to transfer kinetics (energy and momentum) between large conventional aircraft (subsonic or low supersonic) or other motive force and smaller aerodynamic vehicles, propelling them to hypersonic velocities without exotic propulsion systems.


A rotating and non-rotating skyhooks in orbit

A skyhook is a theoretical class of orbiting tether propulsion intended to lift payloads to high altitudes and speeds.[26][27] Proposals for skyhooks include designs that employ tethers spinning at hypersonic speed for catching high speed payloads or high altitude aircraft and placing them in orbit.[28]

Space elevator

Diagram of a space elevator.  At the bottom of the tall diagram is the Earth as viewed from high above the North Pole.  About six Earth-radii above the Earth an arc is drawn with the same center as the Earth.  The arc depicts the level of geosynchronous orbit.  About twice as high as the arc and directly above the Earth's center, a counterweight is depicted by a small square.  A line depicting the space elevator's cable connects the counterweight to the equator directly below it.  The system's center of mass is described as above the level of geosynchronous orbit.  The center of mass is shown roughly to be about a quarter of the way up from the geosynchronous arc to the counterweight.  The bottom of the cable is indicated to be anchored at the equator.  A climber is depicted by a small rounded square.  The climber is shown climbing the cable about one third of the way from the ground to the arc. Another note indicates that the cable rotates along with the Earth's daily rotation, and remains vertical.
A space elevator would consist of a cable anchored to the Earth's surface, reaching into space.

A space elevator is a proposed type of space transportation system.[29] Its main component is a ribbon-like cable (also called a tether) anchored to the surface and extending into space above the level of geosynchronous orbit. As the planet rotates, the centrifugal force at the upper end of the tether counteracts gravity, and keeps the cable taut. Vehicles can then climb the tether and reach orbit without the use of rocket propulsion.

Such a cable could be made out of any material able to support itself under tension by tapering the cable's diameter sufficiently quickly as it approached the Earth's surface. On Earth, with its relatively strong gravity, current technology is not capable of manufacturing tether materials that are sufficiently strong and light. With conventional materials, the taper ratio would need to be very large, escalating the total launch mass to a very large degree, and making conventional materials fiscally infeasible. However, recent concepts for a space elevator are notable for their plans to use carbon nanotube or boron nitride nanotube based materials as the tensile element in the tether design. The measured strengths of those nanotube molecules are high compared to their linear densities. They hold promise as materials to make an Earth-based space elevator possible.[30]

The space elevator concept is also applicable to other planets and celestial bodies. For locations in the Solar System with weaker gravity than Earth's (such as the Moon or Mars), the strength-to-density requirements aren't as great for tether materials. Currently available materials (such as Kevlar) are strong and light enough that they could be used as the tether material for elevators there.

Endo-atmospheric tethers

KITE Launcher — transferring momentum to the vehicle.

An endo-atmospheric tether uses the long cable within the atmosphere to provide some or all of the velocity needed to reach orbit. The tether is used to transfer kinetics (energy and momentum) from a massive, slow end (typically a large subsonic or low supersonic aircraft) to a hypersonic end through aerodynamics or centripetal action. The Kinetics Interchange TEther (KITE) Launcher is one proposed endo-atmospheric tether.[13]

Dynamic structures

Space fountain

Hyde design space fountain.

A space fountain is a proposed form of space elevator that does not require the structure to be in geosynchronous orbit, and does not rely on tensile strength for support. In contrast to the original space elevator design (a tethered satellite), a space fountain is a tremendously tall tower extending up from the ground. Since such a tall tower could not support its own weight using traditional materials, massive pellets are projected upward from the bottom of the tower and redirected back down once they reach the top, so that the force of redirection holds the top of the tower aloft.

Orbital ring

Orbital ring.

An orbital ring is a concept for a space elevator that consists of a ring in low Earth orbit that rotates at slightly above orbital speed, and has fixed tethers hanging down to the ground.

The first design of an orbital ring offered by A. Yunitsky in 1982.[31]

In the 1982 Paul Birch JBIS design[32] of an orbital ring system, a rotating cable is placed in a low Earth orbit, rotating at slightly faster than orbital speed. Not in orbit, but riding on this ring, supported electromagnetically on superconducting magnets, are ring stations that stay in one place above some designated point on Earth. Hanging down from these ring stations are short space elevators made from cables with high tensile strength to mass ratio. Paul Birch found that since the ring station can be used to accelerate the orbital ring eastwards as well as hold the tether, it is possible to deliberately cause the orbital ring to precess around Earth instead of staying fixed in inertial space while the Earth rotates beneath it. By making the precession rate large enough, the orbital ring can be made to precess once per day at the rate of rotation of the Earth. The ring is now "geostationary" without having to be either at the normal geostationary altitude or even in the equatorial plane.

Launch loop

Launch loop.

A launch loop or Lofstrom loop is a design for a belt-based maglev orbital launch system that would be around 2000 km long and maintained at an altitude of up to 80 km (50 mi). Vehicles weighing 5 metric tons would be electromagnetically accelerated on top of the cable which forms an acceleration track, from which they would be projected into Earth orbit or even beyond. The structure would constantly need around 200 MW of power to keep it in place.

The system is designed to be suitable for launching humans for space tourism, space exploration and space colonization with a maximum of 3 g acceleration.[33] Some other Launch Loops are developed in [34]

Pneumatic freestanding tower

One proposed design is a freestanding tower composed of high strength material (e.g. kevlar) tubular columns inflated with a low density gas mix, and with dynamic stabilization systems including gyroscopes and "pressure balancing".[35] Suggested benefits in contrast to other space elevator designs include avoiding working with the great lengths of structure involved in some other designs, construction from the ground instead of orbit, and functional access to the entire range of altitudes within the design's practical reach. The design presented is "at 5 km altitude and extending to 20 km above sea level", and the authors suggest that "the approach may be further scaled to provide direct access to altitudes above 200 km".

A major difficulty of such a tower is buckling since it is a long slender construction.

Projectile launchers

With any of these projectile launchers, the launcher gives a high velocity at, or near, ground level. In order to achieve orbit, the projectile must be given enough extra velocity to punch through the atmosphere, unless it includes an additional propulsion system (such as a rocket). Also, the projectile needs either an internal or external means to perform orbital insertion. The designs below fall into three categories, electrically driven, chemically driven, and mechanically driven.

Electromagnetic acceleration

Electrical launch systems include mass drivers, railguns, and coilguns. All of these systems use the concept of a stationary launch track which uses some form of linear electrical motor to accelerate a projectile.

Mass driver

A mass driver for lunar launch (artist's conception).

A mass driver is basically a very long and mainly horizontally aligned launch track for space launch, targeted upwards at the end. The concept was proposed by Arthur C. Clarke in 1950,[36] and was developed in more detail by Gerard K. O'Neill, working with the Space Studies Institute, focusing on the use of a mass driver for launching material from the Moon.

It would use a linear motor to accelerate payloads up to high speeds. Sequential firing of a row of electromagnets accelerates the payload along a path. After leaving the path, the payload continues to move due to inertia.


StarTram Generation 2 is a proposal for an evacuated tube at 22 km for launching vehicles into space, held up by a large current in superconducting cables that repels another set of cables on the ground with an opposing current flow. Other versions of the concept would fire vehicles from a tube exiting on a mountain peak.[14]

Rail gun

Electro-dynamic interactions in a rail gun.

A rail gun is a pair of conductive rails with a projectile between them. A coil gun similarly could be used for a non-rocket space launch.


Space gun

Project HARP, a prototype of a space gun.

A space gun is a proposed method of launching an object into outer space using a large gun, or cannon. Science fiction writer Jules Verne proposed such a launch method in From the Earth to the Moon, and in 1902 a movie, A Trip to the Moon, was adapted.

However, even with a "gun barrel" through both the Earth's crust and troposphere, the g-forces required to generate escape velocity would still be more than what a human tolerates. Therefore, the space gun would be restricted to freight and ruggedized satellites. Also, the projectile needs either an internal or external means to stabilize on orbit.

Gun launch concepts do not always use combustion. In pneumatic launch systems, a projectile is accelerated in a long tube by air pressure, produced by ground-based turbines or other means. In a light-gas gun, the pressurant is a gas of light molecular weight, to maximize the speed of sound in the gas.

In the 1990s, John Hunter of Quicklaunch proposed use of a 'Hydrogen Gun' to launch unmanned payloads to orbit for less than the regular launch costs.[37]

Ram accelerator

A ram accelerator also uses chemical energy like the space gun but it is entirely different in that it relies on a jet-engine-like propulsion cycle utilizing ramjet and/or scramjet combustion processes to accelerate the projectile to extremely high speeds.

It is a long tube filled with a mixture of combustible gases with a frangible diaphragm at either end to contain the gases. The projectile, which is shaped like a ram jet core, is fired by another means (e.g., a space gun, discussed above) supersonically through the first diaphragm into the end of the tube. It then burns the gases as fuel, accelerating down the tube under jet propulsion. Other physics come into play at higher velocities.

Blast wave accelerator

A blast wave accelerator is similar to a space gun but it differs in that rings of explosive along the length of the barrel are detonated in sequence to keep the accelerations high. Also, rather than just relying on the pressure behind the projectile, the blast wave accelerator specifically times the explosions to squeeze on a tail cone on the projectile, as one might shoot a pumpkin seed by squeezing the tapered end.



In a slingatron,[16][38] projectiles are accelerated along a rigid tube or track that typically has circular or spiral turns, or combinations of these geometries in two or three dimensions. A projectile is accelerated in the curved tube by propelling the entire tube in a small-amplitude circular motion of constant or increasing frequency without changing the orientation of the tube, i.e. the entire tube gyrates but does not spin. An everyday example of this motion is stirring a beverage by holding the container and moving it in small horizontal circles, causing the contents to spin, without spinning the container itself.

This gyration continually displaces the tube with a component along the direction of the centripetal force acting on the projectile, so that work is continually done on the projectile as it advances through the machine. The centripetal force experienced by the projectile is the accelerating force, and is proportional to the projectile mass.

Air launch

In air launch, a carrier aircraft carries the space vehicle to high altitude and speed before release. This technique was used on the suborbital X-15 and SpaceshipOne vehicles, and for the Pegasus orbital launch vehicle.

The main disadvantages are that the carrier aircraft tends to be quite large, and separation within the airflow at supersonic speeds has never been demonstrated, thus the boost given is relatively modest.


X-43A with scramjet attached to the underside.

A spaceplane is an aircraft designed to pass the edge of space. It combines some features of an aircraft with some of a spacecraft. Typically, it takes the form of a spacecraft equipped with aerodynamic surfaces, one or more rocket engines, and sometimes additional airbreathing propulsion as well.

Early spaceplanes were used to explore hypersonic flight (e.g. X-15).[39]

Some air-breathing engine-based designs (cf X-30) such as aircraft based on scramjets or pulse detonation engines could potentially achieve orbital velocity or go some useful way to doing so; however, these designs still must perform a final rocket burn at their apogee to circularize their trajectory to avoid returning to the atmosphere. Other, reusable turbojet-like designs like Skylon which uses precooled jet engines up to Mach 5.5 before employing rockets to enter orbit appears to have a mass budget that permits a larger payload than pure rockets while achieving it in a single stage.

Laser propulsion

A laser launch system.

Laser propulsion is a form of beam-powered propulsion where the energy source is a remote laser system which can be ground-based, airborne, orbital, or a combination of these. While climbing out of the atmosphere, the surrounding air can provide the reaction mass. This form of propulsion differs from a conventional chemical rocket where both energy and reaction mass come from the solid or liquid propellants carried on board the vehicle.

The concept of laser propelled vehicles was introduced by Arthur Kantrowitz in 1972.


Balloons can raise the initial altitude of rockets.

However, balloons have relatively low payload (although see the Sky Cat project for an example of a heavy-lift balloon intended for use in the lower atmosphere), and this decreases even more with increasing altitude.

The lifting gas could be helium or hydrogen. Helium is expensive in large quantities. This makes balloons an expensive launch assist technique. Hydrogen could be used as it has the advantage of being cheaper and lighter than helium, but the disadvantage of also being highly flammable. Rockets launched from balloons, known as "rockoons", have been demonstrated but to date, only for suborbital ("sounding rocket") missions. The size of balloon that would be required to lift an orbital launch vehicle would be extremely large.

One prototype of a balloon launch platform has been made by JP Aerospace as "Project Tandem",[40] although it has not been used as a rocket launch vehicle. A spanish company, zero2infinity, is officially developing a launcher system called bloostar based on the rockoon concept, expected to be operational by 2018.[41]

Gerard K. O'Neill proposed that by using very large balloons it may be possible to construct a space port in the stratosphere. Rockets could launch from it or a mass driver could accelerate payloads into the orbit.[42] This has the advantage that most (about 90%) of the atmosphere is below the space port.


Artist depiction of an aerial view of a SpaceShaft.

A SpaceShaft is a proposed atmospherically buoyant structure that would serve as a system to lift cargo to near-space altitudes. It is conceived to have multiple platforms distributed at several elevations that would provide habitation facilities for long term human operations throughout the mid-atmosphere and near-space altitudes.[43][44][45]

A SpaceShaft would be designed to have the capability to lift cargo to space or near-space altitudes. For space launch, it would serve as a non-rocket first stage for rockets launched from the top, with the rocket part of the launch system being smaller than if launched from the surface.[44]

Hybrid launch systems

NASA art for a concept combining three technologies: electromagnetic launch assist from a hypothetical 2-mile (3.2 km) track at Kennedy Space Center, a scramjet aircraft, and a carried rocket which after air launch reaches orbit.

Separate technologies may be combined. The NASA in 2010 suggested that a future scramjet aircraft might be accelerated to 300 m/s (a solution to the problem of ramjet engines not being startable at zero airflow velocity) by electromagnetic or other sled launch assist, in turn air-launching a second-stage rocket delivering a satellite to orbit.[46]

All forms of projectile launchers are at least partially hybrid systems if launching to low Earth orbit, due to the requirement for orbit circularization, at a minimum entailing several percent of total delta-v to raise perigee (e.g. a tiny rocket burn), or in some concepts much more from a rocket thruster to ease ground accelerator development.[14]

Some technologies can have exponential scaling if used in isolation, making the effect of combinations be of counter-intuitive magnitude. For instance, 270 m/s is under 4% of the velocity of low Earth orbit, but a NASA study estimated that Maglifter sled launch at that velocity could increase the payload of a conventional ELV rocket by 80% when also having the track go up a 3000‑meter mountain.[47]

Forms of ground launch limited to a given maximum acceleration (such as due to human g-force tolerances if intended to carry passengers) have the corresponding minimum launcher length scale not linearly but with velocity squared.[48] Tethers can have even more non-linear, exponential scaling. The tether-to-payload mass ratio of a space tether would be around 1:1 at a tip velocity 60% of its characteristic velocity but becomes more than 1000:1 at a tip velocity 240% of its characteristic velocity. For instance, for anticipated practicality and a moderate mass ratio with current materials, the HASTOL concept would have the first half (4 km/s) of velocity to orbit be provided by other means than the tether itself.[9]

A proposal to use a hybrid system combining a mass driver for initial lofting followed by additive thrust by a series of ground-based lasers sequenced according to wavelength was proposed by Mashall Savage in the book The Millenial Project as one of the core theses of the book, but the idea has not been pursued to any notable degree. Savage's specific proposals proved to be infeasible on both engineering and political grounds, and while the difficulties could be overcome, the group Savage founded, now called the Living Universe Foundation, has been unable to raise significant funds for research.

Combining multiple technologies would in itself be an increase to complexity and development challenges, but reducing the performance requirements of a given subsystem may allow reduction in its individual complexity or cost. For instance, the number of parts in a liquid-fueled rocket engine may be two orders of magnitude less if pressure-fed rather than pump-fed if its delta-v requirements are limited enough to make the weight penalty of such be a practical option, or a high-velocity ground launcher may be able to use a relatively moderate performance and inexpensive solid fuel or hybrid small motor on its projectile.[49] Assist by non-rocket methods may compensate against the weight penalty of making an orbital rocket reusable. Though suborbital, the first private manned spaceship, SpaceShipOne had reduced rocket performance requirements due to being a combined system with its air launch.[50]

See also


  1. ^ George Dvorsky, How Humanity Will Conquer Space Without Rockets, io9 Dec. 30, 2014 (accessed Jan 3 2015).
  2. ^ a b "SpaceCast 2020" Report to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, 22 Jun 94.
  3. ^ A Fresh Look at Space Solar Power: New Architectures, Concepts, and Technologies. John C. Mankins. International Astronautical Federation IAF-97-R.2.03. 12 pages.
  4. ^
  5. ^ (Russian)The Exploration of Cosmic Space by Means of Reaction DevicesTsiolkovsky, Исследование мировых пространств реактивными приборами -
  6. ^ Citation copied from Space elevator article. As of Oct 2012, the archived page was still good, but the original no longer functioned.
  7. ^ "The Hypersonic Skyhook", Analog Science Fiction / Science Fact, vol. 113, no. 11, September 1993, pp. 60-70.
  8. ^ "A Non-Synchronous Orbital Skyhook", Hans P. Moravec, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 25, Oct-Dec 1977
  9. ^ a b Paper, AIAA 00-3615 "Design and Simulation of Tether Facilities for HASTOL Architecture", R. Hoyt, 17-19 Jul 2000.
  10. ^ Paper, NIAC 3rd Ann. Mtg, NIAC subcontract no. 07600-040, “Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch – HASTOL”, John E. Grant, 6 Jun 2001.
  11. ^ "Orbital Ring Systems and Jacob's Ladders - I-III". Note: in 1980s money.
  12. ^ a b Launch Loop slides for the ISDC2002 conference
  13. ^ a b Johansen, US patent #6913224, Method and system for accelerating an object, 5 Jul 2005
  14. ^ a b c "The Startram Project": Maglev Launch: Ultra Low Cost Ultra/High Volume Access to Space for Cargo and Humans by James Powell, George Maise and John Rather. Submitted for Presentation at SPESIF-2010 - Space, Propulsion, and Energy Sciences International Forum. February 23, 26, 2010
  15. ^ "Quicklaunch Inc."
  16. ^ a b "Slingatron, A Mechanical Hypervelocity Mass Accelerator"
  17. ^ The Slingatron: Building a Railroad to Space
  18. ^
  19. ^
  20. ^ > [4.0] Space Guns v1.1.4 / Chapter 4 of 7 / 1 jun 2008 / Greg Goebel / Public
  21. ^ Kenneth Gatland. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Space Technology.
  22. ^
  23. ^ In his book "Structures or why things don't fall down" (pub Pelican 1978 - 1984 ), professor J. E. Gordon considers the height of the Tower of Babel. He wrote: brick and stone weigh about 120 LB/ft^3, or 2,000 kg/m^3, and the crushing strength of these materials is approximately 6000 PSI, or 40M N/m^2. Elementary arithmetic shows that a tower with parallel walls could have been built to a height of 7000 feet, or 2 kilometers, before the bricks at the bottom were crushed. However by making the walls taper towards the top they could well have been built to a height where the men of Shinnar would run short of oxygen before the brick walls crushed beneath their own dead weight."
  24. ^ a b Structural Methods. Retrieved May 26, 2011.
  25. ^
  26. ^ Smitherman, D. V., "Space Elevators, An Advanced Earth-Space Infrastructure for the New Millennium", NASA/CP-2000-210429 [1]
  27. ^ Sarmont, E., ”Affordable to the Individual Spaceflight”, accessed Feb. 6, 2014 [2]
  28. ^ Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch (HASTOL) System: Interim Study Results
  29. ^ What is a Space Elevator?
  30. ^ Edwards, Bradley Carl. The NIAC Space Elevator Program. NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts
  31. ^ A. Yunitskii, “General Planetary Transport System”, “TM”  (Technology for Young), no. 6, 1982 (in Russian).; pictures:
  32. ^ "Orbital Ring Systems and Jacob's Ladders - I-III"
  33. ^ Keith Lofstrom's launch energy paper from the International Space Development Conference in 2002
  34. ^ Alexander Bolonkin,“Non Rocket Space Launch and Flight”. Elsevier, 2005. 488 pgs. ISBN 978-0-08044-731-5, ISBN 0-080-44731-7,
  35. ^ (P. 7.)
  36. ^ Clarke, Arthur C., "Electromagnetic Launching as a Major Contribution to Space-Flight," J. British Interplanetary Soc., 9, No. 6 (1950), pp. 261-267. Reprinted in Arthur C. Clarke, Ascent to Orbit: A Scientific Autobiography, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984.
  37. ^ Quicklaunch website (Dead link- see archirved version at internet archive:
  38. ^ Book, "Slingatron - A Mechanical Hypervelocity Mass Accelerator"; Derek A. Tidman; ISBN 978-1-4276-2658-5; Aardvark Global Publishing LLC (November 1, 2007)
  39. ^
  40. ^ (accessed 4 January 2015)
  41. ^
  42. ^
  43. ^
  44. ^ a b
  45. ^
  46. ^
  47. ^
  48. ^
  49. ^ U.S. Air Force Research Report no. AU ARI 93-8: LEO On The Cheap. Retrieved April 29, 2011.
  50. ^

External links

  • Canonical List of Space Transportation and Engineering Methods
  • Earth-to-Orbit Transportation Bibliography, an extensive publication about novel methods of Earth-to-orbit transport
  • Orbital Suborbital Program Space Vehicle document
  • Google Lunar X PRIZE, some commercial initiatives
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.