World Library  


Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

Monitoring Arthropods in Protected Grasslands: Comparing Pitfall Trapping, Quadrat Sampling and Video Monitoring : Volume 15, Issue 1 (04/05/2015)

By Zaller, J. G.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0004023331
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 9
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: Monitoring Arthropods in Protected Grasslands: Comparing Pitfall Trapping, Quadrat Sampling and Video Monitoring : Volume 15, Issue 1 (04/05/2015)  
Author: Zaller, J. G.
Volume: Vol. 15, Issue 1
Language: English
Subject: Science, Ecology
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Historic
Publication Date:
2015
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications

Citation

APA MLA Chicago

Kerschbaumer, G., Schedl, H., Rizzoli, R., Tiefenbacher, A., Zaller, J. G., & Gruber, E. (2015). Monitoring Arthropods in Protected Grasslands: Comparing Pitfall Trapping, Quadrat Sampling and Video Monitoring : Volume 15, Issue 1 (04/05/2015). Retrieved from http://www.ebooklibrary.org/


Description
Description: Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. When monitoring the activity and diversity of arthropods in protected areas it is ethically advisable to use non-destructive methods in order to avoid detrimental effects on natural populations and communities. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of three methods for potential use for arthropod monitoring in a protected grassland: pitfall trapping, quadrat sampling and video monitoring. Pitfall trapping was conducted either during the day or over night (cup diameter 6.5 cm, unfenced, without preservation fluid). Quadrat sampling was conducted within a metal frame (width × length × height: 50 × 50 × 30 cm). Video monitoring was done on a 68 × 37 cm area using a digital high-density video camera mounted on a tripod. The study site was located in a semi-dry grassland northwest of Vienna, Austria (305 m a.s.l., 48°27′ E, 16°34′ N); the three methods were replicated five times. Across the sampling methods a total of 24 arthropod orders were observed with Hymenoptera being the most abundant, followed by Diptera and Coleoptera. The sampling methods differed considerably in number of arthropods recorded: video monitoring (2578 individuals) followed by quadrat sampling (202 individuals), nocturnal (43 individuals) and diurnal pitfall trapping (12 individuals). Diversity of arthropod assemblages varied highly significantly among the tested methods with quadrat sampling yielding the highest diversity 0.70 ± 0.22 (Gini–Simpson index, mean ±SD) followed by video monitoring (0.57 ± 0.15), diurnal pitfall sampling (0.35 ± 0.28) and nocturnal pitfall sampling (0.17 ± 0.24). Video surveillance of the pitfall traps showed that out of a total of 151 individuals crawling in the vicinity of pitfall traps none of them were actually trapped. A tabular comparison listing the advantages and disadvantages of the sampling methods is presented. Taken together, our results suggest that video monitoring has a great potential as a supplementary method for quantitative and qualitative assessments of arthropod activity and diversity in grasslands.

Summary
Monitoring arthropods in protected grasslands: comparing pitfall trapping, quadrat sampling and video monitoring

Excerpt
Andersen, J.: A comparison of pitfall trapping and quadrat sampling of Carabidae (Coleoptera) on river banks, Entomol. Fennica, 6, 65–77, 1995.; Barber, H. S.: Traps for cave-inhabiting insects, J. Elisha Mitch. Sci. S., 46, 259–266, 1931.; Calixto, A. A., Harris, M. K., and Dean, A.: Sampling ants with pitfall traps using either propylene glycol or water as a preservative, Southwest. Entomol., 32, 87–91, 2007.; Cheli, G. H. and Corley, J. C.: Efficient sampling of ground-dwelling arthropods using pitfall traps in arid steppes, Neotrop. Entomol., 39, 912–917, 2010.; Cooper, C. B., Hochachka, W. M., and Dhondt, A. A.: The opportunties and challenges of citizen science as a tool for ecological research, in: Citizen Science. Public Participation in Environmental Research, edited by: Dickinson, J. L., and Bonney, R., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA, 99–113, 2012.; Corti, R., Larned, S. T., and Datry, T.: A comparison of pitfall-trap and quadrat methods for sampling ground-dwelling invertebrates in dry riverbeds, Hydrobiologia, 717, 13–26, doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1563-0, 2013.; Dicks, L. V., Corbet, S. A., and Pywell, R. F.: Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor webs, J. Anim. Ecol., 71, 32–43, 2002.; Drapela, T., Moser, D., Zaller, J. G., and Frank, T.: Spider assemblages in winter oilseed rape affected by landscape and site factors, Ecography, 31, 254–262, 2008.; Desender, K. R.: A simple device and technique for quantitative sampling of riparian beetle populations with some Carabid and Staphylinid abundance estimates on different riparian habitats (Coleoptera), Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol., 22, 497–506, 1985.; Dupont, Y. L., Hansen, D. M., and Olensen, J. M.: Structure of a plant-pollinator network in the high altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands, Ecography, 26, 301–310, 2003.; Edwards, C. A.: The assessment of popula soil inhabiting invertebrates, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 34, 145–176, 1991.; Fisher, B. L.: Improving inventory efficiency: a case study of leaf-litter ant diversity in Madagascar, Ecol. Appl., 9, 714–731, 1999.; Frank, T., Aeschbacher, S., and Zaller, J. G.: Habitat age affects beetle diversity in wildflower areas, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 152, 21–26, 2012.; Franke, U., Friebe, B., and Beck, L.: Methodisches zur Ermittlung der Siedlungsdichte von Bodentieren aus Quadratproben und Barberfallen, Pedobiologia, 32, 253–264, 1988.; Guiasu, R. C. and Guiasu, S.: The weighted gini-simpson index: revitalizing an old index of biodiversity, Int. J. Ecol., 2012, 478728, 10 pp., doi:10.1155/2012/478728, 2012.; Halsall, N. B. and Wratten, S. D.: The efficiency of pitfall trapping for polyphagous predatory Carabidae, Ecol. Entomol., 13, 293–299, 1988.; Hancock, M. H. and Legg, C. J.: Pitfall trapping bias and arthropod body mass, Insect Conserv. Diver, 5, 312–318, 2012.; Hegland, S. J., and Totland, O.: Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland, Oecologia, 145, 586–594, 2005.; Jud, P. and Schmidt-Entling, M. H.: Fluid type, dilution, and bitter agent influence spider preservation in pitfall traps, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 129, 356–359, 2008.; Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N., Muff, S., Memmott, J., Müller, C. B., and Caflisch, A.: The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour, Ecol. Lett., 13, 442–452, 2010.; Ladd, P. G. and Arroyo, M. T.: Comparisons of breeding systems between two sympatric species, Nastanthus spathulatus (Calyceraceae) and Rhodophiala rhodolirion (Amaryllidaceae), in the high Andes of central Chile, Plant Spec. Biol., 24, 2–10, 2009.; Lange, M., Gossner, M. M., and Weisser, W. W.: Effect of pitfall trap type and diameter on vertebrate by-catches and ground beetle (Coleoptera: C


 

Click To View

Additional Books


  • Abhandlungen Der Königlich Preussischen ... Volume: 1913-16 (by )
  • Journal and Proceedings of the Hamilton ... Volume: no. 16-17 1899-1901 (by )
  • Proceedings of the United States Nationa... (by )
  • Izviestiia Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk =... Volume: ser. 5 t. 5 (1896) (by )
  • Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Hand... Volume: ser.1b, 1852 (by )
  • The Philippine Journal of Science Volume: v. 7 pt. A 1912 (by )
  • Hydrographic Situation During Cruise M84... (by )
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume: v. 153, no. 2 (1968) (by )
  • Ji Lin Sheng Zi Ran Di Li (by )
  • Diurnal Temperature Cycle Deduced from E... (by )
  • Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Hand... Volume: ser.1b, 1854 (by )
  • Transactions of the New York Academy of ... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right

 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.